The New Yorker has a funny piece on the perils of conference calls that left me laughing.
It is for these reasons that most people prefer to be silent during the call, with their phones in speaker mode and muted. This is a good time to shower, write the word “Why?” on a notepad until the ink runs dry, or organize your closet by color. Every once in a while, I like to unmute and chime in with a “Yes,” “No,” or “I agree.” About what, I have no idea.
I think that most (knowledge) workers can relate to this form of torture.
This cartoon from the New Yorker reminds me of the Partner / consultant relationship.
There’s a lot of hype/buzz about IoT. Lots of buzz words – MQTT, COAP, Zigbee, platforms – but not really a lot of simple to understand examples.
IBM to its credit has a really simple demo that involves your smartphone. Simply go to http://discover-iot.eu-gb.mybluemix.net/#/play/device/smartphone and type in a name (anything really) and then go to a URL on your phone. Their platform (IoT foundation / Bluemix) then shows your phone’s sensor attributes in real time.
For those still struggling to get their minds around IoT this could be the “aha” moment.
Consultants are of course painfully aware of the awfulness of flying. The fact that airlines seats have become smaller and more uncomfortable over the last 50 years will not then come as any surprise.
What was surprising was the fact that airlines may only be part of that problem. Airline seat widths, pitch have apparently declined ~10% over the last ~50 years, while (ahem) our seats / weights have increased by ~20% over the same period.
The New Yorker had an interesting article about the old/new technology of airships .
Two points caught my eye:
- Early zepplins were made from cow intestines. Apparently it took 250k cows to make one airship. Ouch.
- Apparently “more than two-thirds of the world’s land area and more than half the world’s population has no direct access to paved roads”. That’s a lot.
Move over drones, it’s time for the Amazon airships.
Apparently ~60% of professionals eat lunch at their desks (alone rather than with others) according to the NYT magazine. Although eating with others is of course better (and more fun), there may be a hidden benefit: eating with others causes us to eat more (from ~40% to ~100% more depending on the number of people).
The WSJ had an interesting breakdown of those involved in the “gig economy” (this one based on actual facts – based on a sampling of people’s earnings – rather than opinion).
- Nearly 1% of U.S. adults earned income via a gig (defined as either providing labor – ala Uber, or via capital – ala AirBNB, in Sep 2015).
- The average monthly income for someone who provided labor via one of the platforms was $533, representing a third of total income
- ~60% used their capital (e.g. their house), vs. 40% for labor (i.e. their hours).
Worth a read.